Gartner has published a new edition of its Magic Quadrant for Digital Commerce, and many CIOs and CDOs are asking themselves the same question. Does the new quadrant change anything about our platform decision? Our assessment is that it rarely calls existing decisions into question. It does, however, clearly shift the criteria by which you should measure your platform over the next two to three years.

In 2026, Gartner mainly changed the rules of the game. What is new is which vendors are included at all and which capabilities a platform must bring. To read the new positions correctly, you first need to look at these rules.

What Has Changed Since 2025

In 2025, almost all evaluation criteria were weighted high. In 2026, Gartner concentrates the weight on product, viability, pricing, market understanding and innovation, while customer experience, marketing strategy and sales strategy now only count as medium. The biggest changes, however, are in the market definition, the mandatory scope and the inclusion criteria.

Aspect

2025

2026

Report title

Digital Commerce

Digital Commerce Platforms

Buyers per definition

Customers

Customers and AI agents

Mandatory capabilities

Storefront through checkout, pricing, business tooling, API interoperability

additionally digital experience composition, personalization, low-/no-code integration, B2B basics (entitlements, buyer organizations, quotes, PO numbers) and post-purchase (order status, tracking, returns)

New as optional

AI agents and copilots, third-party agent integration via MCP, digital sales rooms

Removed

Live commerce, sales associate integration, basic PIM

Inclusion criterion

Software revenue between USD 28M and 65M with growth requirements

more than 70 production customers, at least 10 new customers in 2025, relevance to Gartner clients as judged by analysts

Regional spread measured by

Revenue

Customer count

Vendors evaluated

19

14

Honorable mentions

Baozun, Liferay, Ultra Commerce

Centra, Commerce Layer, DJUST, Emporix, PrestaShop

Gartner names three core criteria for buyers in 2026. They are readiness for agentic AI, a flexible architecture and proven scalability for B2B and B2C on a single platform.

New Positions Mostly Reflect New Rules

If a vendor sits in a different spot in 2026 than in 2025, it is often because the field has changed. With five fewer vendors, relative positions shift even when the products themselves have changed little.

On top of that comes the switch from revenue to customer count. From 2026, the number of deals matters more than their size. That likely explains why WooCommerce is new in the quadrant, while Sana, Infosys Equinox, Virto, Elastic Path and HCL are no longer included. Analyst judgment also now ranks first among the inclusion criteria and officially carries more weight.

For you as a platform operator, this means the following. A platform that fit your processes well a year ago fits them just as well today. A drop in the quadrant is a reason to take a closer look. On its own, it is rarely a reason to switch platforms.

Measure Agentic Readiness by What Runs Today

For the first time, Gartner includes AI agents as buyers in its market definition. A platform should enable both customers and agents to buy. As a result, roadmap and agentic capabilities gain weight, while customer experience and go-to-market execution lose relative importance.

The weighting shows how far the lens has shifted. Customer experience, which reflects the satisfaction of reference customers, now counts as medium instead of high. At the same time, some of the agentic capabilities Gartner rates positively are, according to the vendors themselves, still in beta or on the roadmap.

It is also clear which kind of AI counts. One vendor was downgraded because its AI investments are mostly tools for developers. Gartner counts agents and interfaces that reach the customer as readiness.

We think the direction is right. In day-to-day retail, however, we see a different pace. Agents that buy autonomously on behalf of end customers are still the exception today. Agents already deliver measurable value internally, for example in order processing, customer service and data maintenance, and in B2B processes such as replenishment and quoting.

That is why we recommend checking agentic readiness against concrete points. What matters are open interfaces, clean data access to products, prices and inventory, and the ability to connect your own agents through standards such as MCP. A platform that can do this today is well prepared for the agentic future, regardless of what the roadmap slide says.

AI Costs and B2B Automation Become the Benchmark

The cautions Gartner lists for individual vendors show more clearly than the weighting tables what platforms are measured against in 2026. Three topics stand out.

The first is the cost of AI capabilities. For several large vendors, Gartner explicitly flags token- or usage-based AI add-ons as a cost risk. What convinces in a demo can noticeably change the total cost of ownership at full usage.

The second is automation in B2B sales. The benchmark now includes AI capabilities that capture orders from unstructured documents such as PDFs and emails and help negotiate quotes. For manufacturers and wholesalers, this is the most tangible point in the entire report. Manual order entry ties up a lot of capacity in many inside sales teams, and that is exactly where AI already lowers costs and shortens lead times today.

The third is open protocols. Gartner counts support for standards such as MCP, ACP and UCP, through which agents communicate with a platform, as a strength.

The Broader Mandatory Scope Strengthens Composable Architectures

With digital experience composition, personalization, B2B basics and post-purchase as mandatory, the bar for a platform is significantly higher. A pure commerce core barely meets the definition anymore.

Companies therefore have two paths. They opt for a large suite that delivers everything from a single source. Or they connect specialized components into a platform that fits their processes exactly. The new honorable mentions show that Gartner takes the second path seriously. With Commerce Layer, Emporix and DJUST, several API-first vendors with a strong focus on MCP are represented. The group is also considerably more European than last year.

For companies in the DACH region with grown system landscapes, this is good news. ERP, PIM and data platform stay where they are, and the commerce platform grows by the capabilities Gartner now expects. The effort shifts from licensing to integration. That is where a composable platform shows whether it delivers on its advantages.

Gartner applies a strict standard here. Capabilities that are only available through third-party solutions are still counted against composable vendors as a weakness. In 2025 this concerned CMS and personalization, in 2026 mainly AI assistants in the storefront.

At the same time, the report describes two developments side by side, the continued shift toward composable and a consolidation toward end-to-end suites. The quadrant does not make the architecture decision for you. It depends on your processes, your system landscape and how well the components are integrated.

Six Questions for Your Next Platform Review

The quadrant provides good market orientation. These six questions answer the decision for your company more precisely.

  1. Which of the new mandatory capabilities does your platform cover today, and which do you actually need for your business?

  2. How are AI capabilities priced in your contract, and what will they cost at full usage over the entire term?

  3. Can your own or third-party agents access products, prices, inventory and orders today, for example via MCP?

  4. Do you run B2B and B2C on a single platform, or do you operate the same capabilities twice?

  5. Where does your platform tie up the largest share of budget and team capacity today, and would switching change that?

  6. How quickly can you bring a new capability such as automated order capture or a service agent live?

Our Conclusion

The 2026 Magic Quadrant describes a commerce platform that does more than sell. It composes experiences, serves B2B and B2C together and opens up to agents. This direction matches what we see in projects with retail and manufacturing companies.

Reading the positions in the quadrant as a ranking easily leads to the wrong conclusions. Using the new criteria as a checklist for your own platform gives you a clear plan for the next stages of development. We would be happy to discuss with you where your platform stands today and which steps pay off for your business.

This article is based on the Gartner reports “Magic Quadrant for Digital Commerce” (2025) and “Magic Quadrant for Digital Commerce Platforms” (2026). The assessment reflects the views of foobar Agency.

More on the What Works Tomorrow Podcast

In the latest episode of What Works Tomorrow, Philipp Krüger and Matthias Dietrich discuss the changes in the 2026 Magic Quadrant and what they mean for commerce leaders. The episode (in German) is available on YouTube, Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

Marketing cookies are required to play this video.

Matthias Dietrich

Matthias Dietrich

Co-CEO

Matthias Dietrich is founder and Co-CEOCEO of foobar Agency and has been leading eCommerce projects for retailers and manufacturers in the DACH region for over 20 years—winning first place at the 2024 E-Commerce Germany Award. As a former developer, he always approaches platform strategy from an architectural perspective: rooted in business processes and open to data and AI. His current focus: why AI is dramatically widening the gap between digital pioneers and the rest—and what that specifically means for B2B manufacturers and retailers.

All articles by Matthias Dietrich